Saturday, July 4, 2009
Thursday, July 2, 2009
I'm starting to get suspiscious
don't actually used, but thought we should keep the account because
we've been waiting to upgrade to Verizon's FIOS for Internet and
cable. The line was installed earlier in the year, and we've gotten a
few cards from sales reps trying to sign us up. I knew it would be a
while between the lines being laid to when we could actually start the
service, so we weren't in any hurry to contact anyone.
Current situation: a door-to-door sales rep came by last Friday or
Saturday evening. We signed up for the triple play (phone, Internet,
cable) even though we don't need the phone. But you sign up for all
three then cancel what you don't want later. That's fine, that seems
to be the way it usually works.
So anyway, the sales rep guy needs to use our computer to plug in the
order on the Verizon site, I guess. I thought the whole process seemed
a little weird, and they call a thrid party service to confirm you
have knowledge of this guy placing an order in your name. I thought it
was weird, but I saw he had other filled out slips in his folder, so
we're at least not the only people falling for a scam. So we set an
install date for a couple weeks from now.
Yesterday I got a voicemail from Verizon giving me no more information
than call this number in less that 24hrs or your order is cancelled.
So I tried the number. Invalid number.
I don't know my login or account number or anything for the website,
so I can't really do anything from work. At least this evening I'll
have an account number the plug in and see if the website tells me
anything.
And the weirdest part? The computer the guy used to put in the order
is dead as of two day ago. Wonder if he put a virus on it.
Click for full post and comments
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Kaput
~~END~~
Click for full post and comments
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Making my list, checking it twice
Anyway, back to thinking about food.
~~END~~
Click for full post and comments
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Yay Godzilla
By measuring, it is 30% more moon goodness than from the 300mm telephoto, as yet to be named.Godzilla's autofocus did a much better job of focusing than I did, and I seem to remember the autofocus on the 300mm lens didn't do a super job. I think my must crisply focused picture with that lens came from manual mode, so pretty much by accident.~~END~~
Click for full post and comments
No luck
Anyway, back to killing my back cleaning the stupid tiles I put in years ago.
Click for full post and commentsThursday, June 25, 2009
I don't care about Michael Jackson
~~END~~
Click for full post and comments
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
More fun with superlens

Some lightning bugs, wide open at f/4 and 25sec:


Another "stuff in my yard" probably 30-40 feet away:

So here's the comparison of 300mm on the 70-300 lens, and 400mm on the 200-400 (red box is field of view):
400 is 25% bigger than 300, so a first level approximation would say that the field of view should be 25% smaller this seems to be true, when comparing the measurements of the two pictures. Learn something new everyday, I guess.I think I actually had a dream about this lens. This morning I remembered what the dream was, but now I can't recall it. I can't even remember if it was good or bad.
~~END~~



